Two museums in Scottish Glasgow have stopped exhibiting mummies. In one case, the human remains have been completely removed from the display, while in the other the mummy is now covered with a cloth. A third museum also plans to make adjustments.
The change came to light when a visitor wanted to show his daughter the mummy of priest Nekht in the Kelvingrove Museum. However, they only found a card with the message that "human remains have been removed as a sign of respect." A head, foot, and hand that were mummified and visible were also gone.
"We believe it shows more respect to the deceased individuals not to exhibit the ancient Egyptian human remains," the museum responded in the British press. An exception can be made if there is "permission from the deceased or their relatives," but that is obviously not possible in this case.
Hidden under a cloth
A second museum in the city apparently already made changes last August for the same reasons. The mummy of Shep-En-Hor in the Hunterian was always exhibited in her richly decorated sarcophagus but has now been made invisible with a cloth. The coffin is still visible to visitors.
The Hunterian says it "strives to become a more ethical institution" and therefore believes that the woman who died 2600 years ago "deserves privacy after her death." Shep-En-Hor had been exhibited since 1820. The mummy of Nekht, about 4000 years old, was excavated in the early twentieth century.
Museum manager Glasgow Life says it also plans to remove some items from the religious museum St. Mungo. This concerns a coffin and some mummified remains.
'History hidden'
The changes stem from tightened guidelines of the international museum council ICOM. They prescribe that "for the sake of human dignity," restraint should be exercised in exhibiting body parts. "Decisions about this must always be made in consultation with descendants or the communities from which they originate."
Critics speak of excessive political correctness. "History is being hidden," fears Conservative politician Murdo Fraser. "Glasgow's museums should be proud of our history, not secretly remove it because of the latest trend in political correctness."
"British museums are too busy censoring and filtering history to meet the demands of woke fanatics," says Chris McGovern, history advisor under former Prime Minister Thatcher, to the Daily Mail. "Soon the Bayeux Tapestry might also not be shown anymore because it depicts too much violence, death, and corpses."
Mummy issues
Other museums say in the British media they will not follow Glasgow's example. National Museums Scotland, which includes several popular institutions in Edinburgh, has no plans to make changes. The renowned British Museum also has no mummy issues, as the Daily Mail puts it.
A spokesperson for the London museum says that human remains can be displayed "with respect, care, and dignity," as long as sufficient context is provided. The museum points to the educational, historical, and scientific value of such pieces. There are plans to make some changes.
The museums in Glasgow have not yet said what will happen to the mummies now. A spokesperson says they are open to sending them back to Egypt.
'Choices change'
Museums in the Netherlands are familiar with the discussion. The Rijksmuseum of Antiquities in Leiden says that there is always "careful handling" "with respect for human dignity," but "finds it important to tell historical stories, not only about life but also about death and dealing with the dead body."
The Amsterdam Allard Pierson has chosen to display the mummies in such a way that visitors can choose not to look. It admits that the "choices we made today (or yesterday) are not necessarily the choices we will make in the future."